Web 2.0 Problems
Showing posts with label Web 2.0 Problems. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Web 2.0 Problems. Show all posts

You ever tried for free hosting services?

November 02, 2012 Add Comment

You ever tried for free hosting services?


To start online business it is very important to make a website first. You website should include all the necessary features of your business. The content of your website must be meaningful. After making an attractive website you can start online business. But for this you need one web hosing company which can host your website properly on the internet. The web hosting service must be reliable. Free web hosting creates many problems. Free web hosting services don’t take money from you but it will be problem for you if you will take their services.

The most common problem attached with free web hosting is advertisements. In this the web hosting company gives their advertisements on your websites. There is bulk of advertisements given by free web hosting services on your website. You cannot stop them as they are hosting your website. But this will decrease the value of your website. If advertisements are related to Google ad sense or yahoo publisher then there may not be any negative impact on visitors then visitors will understand that the ads are related to the content provided on your website.

In other cases visitors will not take it positively. These web hosting services do not show meaningful ads related to your website. Instead of it they used to do advertisement according to them. Then the number of visitors on your website reduces and the ranking level of your website goes down. You will be forced to show the hosting services advertisements on your websites once you will sign on the agreement. Till the period of the agreement you have to face this problem.

So you have to be careful while choosing web hosting services. The ext problem is of URL. If you will use nay free web hosting services then they will not let you use your own URL address. Instead of it you have to use your address sub domain of their main address. This will decrease the popularity of your website. They do not provide full control to you. You will not be able to upload each and everything according to your requirement.

You will be having limited access like uploading your file and not other access. They also keep restriction son bandwidth. You cannot use high bandwidth. There will be limitation of using bandwidth. You cannot go out of that provided bandwidth. It becomes complex situations for users when hosting services keep these types of restrictions. There is another problem of SEO. Search engine will not show your website on its pages. As the hosting service has kept too many restrictions the ranking level of your website goes down and it will get popularity.

Your online business will work properly only when you will get popularity. You can gain this popularity with effective results. The free web hosting affects on your online business and you will not get good response in online business. So if you want to run your business then instead of choosing free web hosting services you should choose any trustable web hosting service which will help you in increasing the ranking level of your website for search engines and to make your website popular among visitors.

Which web hosting service is best?

September 17, 2010 Add Comment

Which web hosting service is best?


One important factor to maintain the reputation and the existence of a website or blog especially those using self hosting services such as choosing the right hosting provider and quality. If the server is frequently down will definitely disappointing and detrimental to the owner of a website or blog, both of SEO, traffic and reputation.
I own so far been quite satisfied with services provided by the company where I put my blog hosting for some, this is because of the hosting discount facilities. Update 24 hours, the server is quite stable and quick to respond when there are things we need. There are a few tips or guidance in choosing web hosting, include the following:


  • Consider the target visitors blog / your website, if you want the traffic is mostly from overseas, you should use servers located abroad.

  • Check the features offered such as auto-installer script, email accounts, FTP, SubDomains, parked domains, etc., besides the capacity offered by hosting providers, whether in accordance with your needs and able to adapt in line with the development of your site. Many hosting providers that offer versatile features with a capacity of bombast and only marketing tactic, or a low price with limited features that end up forcing you to pay far more expensive when you need an upgrade. One service provider with a complete feature is hostgator coupon.

  • Disk Space Quota and Quantities given. Disk Space was the capacity of the server hosting provided it for you, to store your website files. The best option is a hosting package that gives Disk Space in accordance with needs.

  • Magnitude of the given bandwidth. Bandwidth is the capacity of monthly access provided to access your website. Every person who opens a website or download a file from your website to be displayed in a browser such as Mozilla Firefox or Internet Explorer, it will eat the bandwidth. Capacity and bandwidth usage will be reset every month.

  • Domains Allowed. Number of domains that can be used in a hosting package. You can use the first fruit of hosting packages for your entire domain name if the hosting package provides access to it, and you also need to consider the amount of disk space and bandwidth provided, is it enough to run some of your own domain.

Web 2.0 Problems

January 18, 2006 Add Comment

Web 2.0 Problems


What’s the problem? The solutions today never seem to do what I want, and I think there are some hard problems that we may be glossing over in all the hype.

Here’s an example of what I want to use Web 2.0 applications for:

I am often researching different topics either personally or as part of a group:
For example, I’m researching eLearning 2.0 for articles, presentations and my blog? Who is actually doing stuff with this? What are they finding? What works? What doesn’t?
I’m researching content management and Wiki software with a group of people in the office for an upcoming proposal.
I’m researching learning object models in concert with a client.
I’m researching vacation places with my wife.
What I would want Web 2.0 software to provide is the following:

I need to be able to search every document I have, every site/document I’ve viewed or marked in the past. I want these to exist forever so that I don’t have to worry about them. Right now I use desktop search to hit all the documents I’ve got locally. Soon we’ll have a network search to search across all the many project files on the network. And, I’ve been looking at a couple of Web 2.0 applications to find something that will keep all the stuff that I mark out in the world.
Of course, I shouldn’t have to think about which search to use in which case. And, I shouldn’t have to worry about where things are located.
I also need to be able to control access to the information. I have various groups I belong to. These groups may be very long lived or may come together for very short bursts. While we are operating, we want to be able to work collectively. We want the stuff we share to be automatically available after we are done working together (under my search solution). I need to be able to communicate with these groups at the appropriate speed without need for worrying about how to actually reach them. I shouldn’t have to think about email, IM, phone, SMS, etc. And, if I’ve done it via some kind of text, it should save that correspondence along with the group and project.
With the Web 2.0 Software that exists, I find that I have to fight the different (but seemingly related) models. Blogs are great for the simple creation of information – but there is no sense of groups. Wikis definitely can have groups, but they are not nearly as easy to get setup and going as Blogs. And, of course, all the linking, adding comments, file sharing stuff seems to suggest the use of Social Bookmarking. But this really doesn’t seem to handle the grouping aspects at all.

I think some of this is going to naturally fall away, especially as people like Yahoo start to pull in all these separate pieces.

But there are two problems that I see looming: one is Solo vs. Group; the other is hierarchy, tagging vs. search.

Part of the beauty of Blogs is the incredible ease - you can just create it and go. Literally, this blog took 10 minutes to setup. Blogs are primarily a linear activity (generally with one owner or a small group of owners). Aggregation then becomes the problem. How do you turn all of these separate unrelated linear streams of activity into a meaningful collection. Do you just search? Do you enforce structure? Sure there’s software (even myYahoo) that can aggregate the RSS feeds, right? But it doesn’t really pull them together in any meaningful way. And, people can go on their merry way saying what they want in their Blog without every really participating in the aggregated group. They may even be unaware of other blogs talking about the same topic. It becomes the responsibility of the reader to make sense of the many streams of information. And, there is inherently little structure. 

Wikis come at it from an explicit group standpoint. I think this group modeling is very important and some of the Wiki tools have it right where you can define groups and then define what they can do and what they see. Of course, there’s still mental overhead to set this up for each group. And, there’s even more overhead in thinking about how the group will work together. A wiki generally also forces you to face the question of how do you organize the information.

And both Wikis and Blogs today are really bad at supporting the collection of documents and links, tagging those.

The structure part is also really interesting. I love the idea of tagging. It frees me from having to think about the hierarchy. Certainly now that I have desktop search, I’m less concerned about where files get place and my inbox doesn’t get sorted into a whole bunch of project specific folders anymore. At the same time, I’ve not found tagging to be very helpful to me. It’s too random. I find that I’m missing things. I end up having to go back to search and retag.

Yeah, I know that Web 2.0 is all about having software in small chunks that you can compose together. But, it sure doesn’t feel easy right now having all these separate pieces running around.

Worse yet, what would I recommend a client adopt who wants to do the same kind of thing internally?

I’m really excited about where this is going, but I feel like we are actually at Web 2.0 pre-alpha release right now.

Or am I missing it?
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)